Sun Earth Energy
  • Home
  • Energy Solutions
    • Energy Efficiency – Energy is Not Just Electricity
      • Energy vs Electricity Analysis
      • Importance of Efficiency
      • Forms of Energy
    • Solar, Wind & Sun Science
      • Solar Flare Monitoring
      • Solar Radiation Impacts
      • Solar Technology & Innovation
      • Climatic Pressures
      • Wind and Waves
    • Infrastructure Resilience
      • Critical Materials & Supply Chain
      • Infrastructure Resilience
      • Heat & Cooling Networks
    • Alternative Energy
      • Hydro Power
      • Osmotic Power
      • Wave Power
      • Geothermal Energy
      • Nuclear Energy
  • Waste Management & Energy
    • Sewage Sludge Processing
    • PFAS Treatment Solutions
    • Bio-Methane Extraction
    • Waste Heat Recovery
    • Other Recycling Technologies
  • Projects & Consulting
    • Current Projects
    • Consultancy Services
    • Case Studies
    • Investment Opportunities
  • Resources & Analysis
    • Technical Papers
    • Energy Data & Statistics
    • Climate & Environment Analysis
    • Policy Analysis
    • WP Blog
    • Check Out CHP4
    • Bio-CHP4
  • About & Contact
    • About Sun Earth Energy
    • Founder & Team Expertise
    • Contact Information
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Live Electricity Mix
  1. You are here:  
  2. Home

DRAX and Dirty Secrets

Details
Written by: J C Burke
Published: 12 February 2026
Last Updated: 12 February 2026
Hits: 12
  • DRAX and Efficiency Failings
  • Cooling Tower Wasted Heat Energy
  • Centralised Power

DraxDRAX Power Station:

A 50-Year Testament to Thermodynamic Waste

From Yorkshire Coal to American Wood Pellets: The Persistence of Centralised Inefficiency

A Critical Analysis Based on Direct Experience, 1975-2026

Introduction: An Engineer's Perspective

In 1975, as an undergraduate student pursuing a degree in Building Technology, Finance and Management (1972-1976), I was assigned to an industrial training placement with Norwest Holst in Leeds. My task was to contribute to the estimation & planning programme for the construction of the cooling towers - 114m high (built in phases - now 12 Cooling Towers) at the newly developing DRAX Power Station in North Yorkshire. Those towers, each a massive concrete structure, represented more than mere engineering ambition—they were physical monuments to thermodynamic waste, the unavoidable consequence of the Carnot cycle's limitations when applied to centralised thermal power generation.

At that time, DRAX—along with Eggborough and Ferrybridge coal-fired stations built atop the vast Selby Coalfield—was designed to achieve approximately 22% fuel efficiency in converting coal to electricity for the Central Electricity Generating Board (CEGB). This figure is not a detail; it is the fundamental indictment of the entire enterprise. With 22% efficiency, approximately 78% of the energy content of the coal became waste heat, requiring those eight cooling towers to dump it into the atmosphere. The UK was, in effect, burning five times the coal it would have needed had it pursued decentralised combined heat and power (CHP) systems, which can achieve 80-90% total efficiency by productively using the "waste" heat.

This article examines DRAX's transformation from coal to biomass burning, analysing why this change—despite being lauded as "green"—represents merely a continuation of the original thermodynamic sin, now compounded by international wood pellet transport, forest destruction, and elaborate carbon accounting fraud.

The Original Sin: Engineering Waste into the Foundation

The Carnot Cycle and the Cooling Towers

Those eight/ten cooling towers at DRAX were the engineers' answer to the inescapable reality of the Carnot efficiency limit. In a thermal power station, fuel combustion creates high-temperature steam to drive turbines. The second law of thermodynamics dictates that converting this thermal energy to mechanical work (and thence to electricity) cannot be 100% efficient. The lower the temperature differential between the heat source and the cooling reservoir, the lower the theoretical maximum efficiency.

Read more: DRAX and Dirty Secrets

The Bio-Methane Economy

Details
Written by: Commonwealth Secretariat & Sun Earth Energy
Published: 11 February 2026
Last Updated: 11 February 2026
Hits: 23
  • Bio-Methane Economy

Anaergia Italy plantThe Bio-Methane Economy:

Transforming Waste into Wealth Across the Commonwealth

A New Paradigm for Sustainable Urban Development

The world stands at a critical juncture. Urban populations are expanding rapidly, waste management systems are overwhelmed, energy security remains precarious, and resource efficiency demands immediate action. What if a single integrated solution could address all these challenges simultaneously?

Enter the Bio-Methane Economy—an emerging paradigm that transforms urban waste streams into clean energy while capturing valuable methane resources that would otherwise escape as air pollutants, creating circular nutrient cycles, and delivering reliable power, heating, and cooling to city centres through decentralised Combined Cooling, Heating and Power (CCHP) systems.

This is not theoretical. The technology exists. The economics work. What's needed now is vision, investment, and political will. Innovative investment structures, supported by Qatar's commitment to global green energy leadership and the unique UK-Qatar partnership, aim to deploy this proven solution across Commonwealth nations.

Understanding the Bio-Methane Economy

The Three Pillars

The Bio-Methane Economy rests on three integrated pillars that create a virtuous cycle of resource efficiency:

1. Waste Management Excellence

Cities generate enormous volumes of organic waste—sewage sludge from treatment works, food waste from households and restaurants, agricultural residues from surrounding regions. Traditionally, these materials create environmental hazards: landfills that leak methane (a 'claimed' greenhouse gas 28 times more potent than CO₂), contaminated waterways, and lost nutrients that could enrich agricultural soils.

Read more: The Bio-Methane Economy

A Cautionary Winter's Tale

Details
Written by: J C Burke
Published: 03 February 2026
Last Updated: 03 February 2026
Hits: 586
  • Heat Pump Limitations
  • Cold Winter Problems
  • Internal Electrical Heaters
air source heat pumps uk"Cautionary Winter's Tale" (very Dickensian - perhaps "The Ghost of Energy Bills Present"!).

1. Opening: From Optimism to Reality

When Hope Meets Winter: The Promise and the Reality

In March 2023, when we first published our technical guidance on heat pumps, the narrative was straightforward and optimistic. With proper sizing, suitable location, high-efficiency equipment, energy-efficient hot water storage, and climate-appropriate design, heat pumps represented a sensible path toward decarbonized heating for UK homes.

The preconditions seemed achievable. The technology was proven. The government was supportive with grants. And the climate projections suggested continued mild winters would favor heat pump efficiency.

Fast forward to February 2026, and we find ourselves in markedly different circumstances - a confluence of factors that demands a fundamental reassessment:

  • Electricity prices have reached unprecedented levels: At 27.7p/kWh, UK electricity is now among the most expensive in the developed world - 4.4 times the cost of gas at 6.3p/kWh. Industrial electricity prices have surged 124% since 2019, while the US saw only 21% increases over the same period.
  • Winter 2025-26 has defied the warming predictions: Temperatures plummeted to -12.5°C in Norfolk, with northern Scotland experiencing snowfall accumulations of 50cm - some of the heaviest in living memory. Rural areas across the Midlands, East Anglia, and northern England saw sustained periods between -8°C and -15°C, precisely the conditions that challenge heat pump efficiency and force reliance on expensive backup heating.
  • The "all-electric" vision collides with economic reality: What was theoretically sound in 2023 has become financially punishing in 2026. The mathematics are stark - a well-insulated home heated by gas costs approximately £720 annually, while the same home using a heat pump with necessary backup heating during this winter's cold snaps costs £1,160-£1,330.

This is not to say heat pumps are fundamentally flawed technology. Rather, it's an acknowledgment that the preconditions we outlined in 2023 - particularly the economic preconditions - have shifted dramatically. The question is no longer simply "can heat pumps work?" but "at what cost, and under what circumstances?"

As Charles Dickens might have observed: "It was the best of technologies, it was the worst of economics."

2. Buffer Tanks: The Unsung Heroes of Cost Control

Thermal Storage - More Critical Than Ever

Read more: A Cautionary Winter's Tale

Ed Milliband and ENERGY SERFDOM

Details
Written by: J C Burke
Published: 19 January 2026
Last Updated: 19 January 2026
Hits: 152
  • Wind
  • Off-Shore Wind
  • CfD Subsidies

Wind and SubsidiesWho Can Afford Wind Power?

Medieval serfs were tied to the land, forced to provide a portion of their harvest to feudal lords, with no choice and no escape. Their children inherited the same bondage. Today, UK energy consumers find themselves in a remarkably similar position—tied to an electricity grid, forced to provide a portion of their wages to subsidize wind farm operators, with no choice and no escape. Welcome to Energy Serfdom.

The term may sound provocative, but the parallels are precise. UK consumers are coerced into funding a system that guarantees profits for energy companies while they bear all the risk. The Labour government—founded to free workers from exploitation—now enforces a neo-feudal energy regime where workers' wages are extracted to enrich others, and future generations inherit the debt. This is the reality behind the promise of cheaper, cleaner energy.

The Subsidy Tribute: £2.6 Billion and Rising

In 2025, UK households paid a record £2.6 billion in Contract for Difference (CfD) subsidies to renewable generators, with offshore wind taking over £2 billion of this total. Like the medieval tithe, this tribute is mandatory, extracted through electricity bills, with no option to refuse.

Individual wind farms have received staggering sums. Hornsea 1 offshore wind farm alone has collected £2.25 billion in subsidies since its CfD contract began—more than the GDP of some small nations. In 2025, offshore wind generators received approximately 52% of their total revenue from subsidies rather than market sales. They are the new feudal lords, collecting tribute while consumers toil.

These CfD figures represent only one stream of extraction. Serfs also pay through the Renewables Obligation scheme, constraint payments when wind farms are paid to reduce output, grid upgrade costs, and carbon levies on gas generation. The total burden is staggering and growing.

Bondage Without Choice: The Serfdom Structure

Medieval serfdom had defining characteristics. Energy Serfdom mirrors them precisely:

Tied to the domain: Just as serfs could not leave the manor, consumers cannot escape the grid. Every household and business must participate. Geographic monopoly ensures captivity.

Read more: Ed Milliband and ENERGY SERFDOM

Page 1 of 14

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10

Smart Search


Advanced Search

Most Viewed

  • Anaerobic Digestion (AD) and biogas industry
  • A Cautionary Winter's Tale
  • AI and EV Infrastructure Needs
  • Alberta Changes the CO2 imperative
  • An Holistic Approach to City Re-Development
  • Anaerobic Digestion for CHP Fuels

Recent Articles

  • A Cautionary Winter's Tale
  • DRAX and Dirty Secrets
  • Ed Milliband and ENERGY SERFDOM
  • The Bio-Methane Economy

Login Form

Registration is by Invitation ONLY

  • Forgot your password?
  • Forgot your username?

Copyright © 2009-2026 | Sun Earth Energy Ltd | Qsir Ltd | Zero Energy Systems Ltd | All Rights Reserved |  X/Twitter
Now Running Joomla 6.0.3-rc1 | Updated: 7th February 2026

  • About Us
  • T and Cs